What evidence-linked feedback looks like
Useful feedback names both sides of a potential mismatch, explains the comparison, and preserves the student's decision.
A finding needs two anchors
“Check your numbers” is not actionable. A finding should name the statement and the table, figure, calculation, or rubric line used for comparison.
The rule must be visible
Explain whether the check compared exact values, rounding, units, references, or lexical evidence.
Uncertainty belongs in the finding
A checker should distinguish detected difference from proven error and identify transformations it cannot reconstruct.
The student remains the author
Review the evidence, apply course rules, and make the correction yourself rather than accepting replacement prose.
Sources and boundaries
- [1]
- [2]
Solice develops LabCrux. The independent sources above do not sponsor or endorse the product. This page explains a review method; your experimental evidence, course instructions, and instructor remain authoritative.